Home
Contact️
Guide️
I F S ❤️
Open-Topic
Zoom

Searching...

Exercise Menu
Video List
Exercise Menu
Video List
IFS Exercise
essene_book


The Essene Gospel of Peace &
Love’s Breath Session
Tuesday – Friday@ 6:30 PM ET
 
Zoom Link :
https://MiamiNetwork.org/zoom

Open to everyone.

 

 

Anatomy IFS Function  Description
Amygdala Protective parts, especially Firefighters The amygdala is the brain’s “smoke detector,” activating the fight-flight-freeze response when danger is perceived. In IFS, Firefighter parts are reactive and impulsive protectors that engage in extreme behaviors (like substance abuse, overeating, or dissociation) to extinguish the pain of exiled parts, bypassing the thinking brain.
• Healing with IFS can calm the overactive amygdala by helping parts feel safe.
Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) Protective parts (Managers) and the Self

The PFC is associated with executive functions like planning, decision-making, and emotional regulation. 

• Managers: Proactive protective parts that control emotions and situations to prevent painful feelings from emerging. When Managers are in charge, they can use rationalization, perfectionism, or critical thinking in an extreme, controlling way, which relates to the PFC working overtime.

• The Self: When the core Self is in the lead, the brain’s networks work harmoniously. This is associated with an enhanced, balanced PFC function that allows for emotional regulation and wise decision-making.

Right Brain The Self and Exiled Parts

Associated with emotional processing, non-verbal communication, creativity, empathy, and holistic thinking.

• The Self: The Self’s traits of compassion, creativity, and connectedness align with the integrative and empathetic functions of the right brain.

• Exiles: As trauma memories are often stored in a non-verbal, sensory-based format linked to the right brain, Exiled parts communicate through imagery, body sensations, and emotions rather than words.

Left Brain  Protective Parts (Managers)

Corresponds to logic, analysis, and order.

• Protectors: Managers often use left-brain-aligned functions, such as over-analyzing or excessive thinking, to maintain control and avoid painful emotions. This can lead to rigidity and a narrow, reductionist focus.

Past Trauma  Wounded and Exiled Parts

Trauma is viewed not as something that happened to the Self but as an injury that affected specific parts of the personality.

• Traumatic Events: IFS differentiates between the event and the internal consequence, which is the wound carried by an Exiled part. These parts are often frozen in time, holding the pain, fear, and negative beliefs from the traumatic experience.

• Adaptive Responses: The protective roles of Managers and Firefighters are direct coping strategies that formed in response to trauma. These parts initially served a crucial purpose for survival, but become maladaptive when the original danger has passed.

     

 

The neuroscience of IFS healing

IFS calm internal relationships can “rewire” or “re-map” neural pathways. 
  • Neuroplasticity: IFS promotes neuroplasticity, the brain’s ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections.

    Repeated experiences of self-compassion and connection with parts can replace old, rigid survival strategies and mistaken beliefs.

  • Bottom-up healing: By focusing on the subconscious processes of the parts, IFS helps release the emotional “burdens” that are often held in the nervous system and body. This “bottom-up” approach contrasts with the “top-down” approach of CBT, which focus on conscious thought patterns.

  • Somatic Awareness: Because trauma is also stored in the body, IFS uses somatic awareness (noticing body sensations) to help access cues from parts. For example, a tightening in the chest might be the signal of a fearful Exiled part. 

    LB_RB_linkedin

 

 

 

 IFS Self

… is a direct outcome of successfully connecting with and leading from the Self in the Internal Family Systems (IFS) model.

The Self is the innate core of a person that is calm, confident, and compassionate, and when it is in charge, it can guide the various “parts” of the mind to work together, leading to internal balance and emotional well-being. 

How the IFS Self creates harmony

Understanding parts: The IFS model views the mind as an inner “family” of different “parts,” such as the inner critic, the people-pleaser, or the scared child (exiles). These parts develop to cope with past experiences, but they can sometimes be in conflict.

Leading from the Self: When a person leads from their Self, they can see these parts without being overwhelmed by them. The Self provides a central, wise, and calm perspective from which to understand the other parts’ intentions and fears.

Compassionate leadership: The Self interacts with the parts with compassion and curiosity, not judgment. For example, a “protector” part that is an inner critic can be reassured by the Self that its job is understood, while the Self guides it toward less harsh ways of operating.

Healing and balance: By fostering a harmonious relationship between the Self and the parts, individuals can heal old wounds carried by exiled parts and create a sense of inner peace. This leads to a more stable and resilient emotional state, where one feels less reactive and more in control of their feelings. 

A universal framework for human well-being, integrating the functions of the pre-frontal cortex, the left and right brain, and the amygdala. This approach promotes a calm, present-moment experience by managing protective, trauma-programmed responses from the amygdala.

There is no single brain region that serves as the location of the “Self” in IFS. 

Neurobiological explanations suggest the experience of the Self involves the coordinated, integrated activity of several interconnected brain networks. From a neuroscience perspective, the Self can be understood as the result of whole-brain integration, where an individual’s core is calm, compassionate, and grounded. 

The main brain areas and networks associated
with the experience of the Self include:

The Default Mode Network (DMN): The DMN is a set of interconnected brain regions that are most active when a person is at rest and not focused on the external world, such as during daydreaming or self-reflection. It is strongly associated with our sense of self, self-referential thought, and creating a continuous, narrative sense of identity. Key areas of the DMN include:

Medial Prefrontal Cortex (mPFC): Heavily involved in processing self-related information and plays a role in forming one’s self-concept.

Posterior Cingulate Cortex (PCC) and Precuneus: These regions are involved in memory retrieval and the integration of sensory and cognitive information to form self-awareness.

The Right Hemisphere: According to some theories that link IFS to neuroscience, the holistic and integrative functions of the right brain mirror the qualities of the Self. The right hemisphere is associated with processing the “big picture,” emotional attunement, empathy, and connection to the present moment—all central characteristics of the Self in IFS.

The Prefrontal Cortex (PFC): A core function of the Self involves self-leadership, which includes a balanced, rational perspective and emotional regulation. The PFC is crucial for these executive functions, and IFS is thought to enhance its function, allowing it to act as a wise “conductor” for the rest of the brain’s “orchestra”.

The Insular Cortex (or Insula): This region plays a critical role in interoception, or the sense of the body’s internal state. It is involved in self-reference and our experience of a physical sense of self. The calming and grounding experienced when accessing the Self in IFS is thought to involve regulation of the insula. 

IFS operates by promoting whole-brain integration and fostering neuroplasticity. The goal is to calm threat-response networks (like those in the amygdala) while simultaneously strengthening pathways in the PFC associated with self-regulation. This allows for a more integrated, less fragmented internal system that is led by the core Self. 

The prefrontal cortex (PFC)

Fundamentally shapes behavior by enabling complex executive functions, such as planning, decision-making, self-control, and impulse inhibition, allowing us to act purposefully toward goals. It also plays a key role in regulating emotions, focusing attention, and managing social behaviors, including empathy.

To understand how the brain’s right hemisphere and prefrontal cortex function in harmony, to foster a calm, “in-the-now” state of mind, like a peaceful river flowing, it helps to view them as a “spatial feeling awareness” (RB) and a “thinking brain” (PFC) that collaborate when not overwhelmed by threats that trigger the amygdala. This harmonious calm state is characterized by reduced amygdala activity and reinforcing calm neural connections, allowing for emotional balance and calm mindful awareness.

The brain’s architecture for calm

The Right Hemisphere: Involves a spacial awareness and is often reffered to as the holistic environmental awarness or “feeling brain.” This part of the brain is associated with creativity, holistic processing, and sensing our internal state (interoception). Interoception is the sense that helps you perceive and interpret signals from within your own body, such as hunger, thirst, pain, fatigue, and mood. It is the brain’s way of sensing, integrating, and responding to the internal environment of the body, providing crucial feedback for maintaining physical and emotional balance (homeostasis) and understanding our feelings. In a calm, untriggered state, it provides a rich, non-verbal awareness of our current experience, such as the awareness of our breathing or the sensations in our body.

Our right brain awareness can not experience sequential time, nor hierarchy, nor judgment. It experiences life as an infinite, three-dimensional space of pure awareness. This is why moments of beauty, love, and presence feel timeless to you – because they ARE timeless.

We are discovering that true satisfaction comes not from the left brain’s endless narrative of seeking and never finding peace, but peace is found in the right brain’s eternal gratitude while living in the now. This gentle, non-demanding awareness is our natural state – peace, experienced now, in this sacred gift, with acceptance and gratitude for life itself.

What you have discovered already lives within you – this peaceful, timeless awareness that Carl Jung called ‘a priori’ – always present, always abiding, no need to wait, because there is no time. This is not something you need to achieve – it’s something you already ARE.

“Even in the busiest mind, there exists a place of perfect peace—this is the beginning of your journey home to yourself.
~Sadhvi Bhagawati Saraswati, PhD Renowned spiritual leader, author and motivational speaker based in Rishikesh, India. She’s the author of newly released #1 bestselling memoir, Hollywood to the Himalayas: A Journey of Healing and Transformation. Originally from Los Angeles and a graduate of Stanford University, Sadhviji has been ordained into the sacred order of Sanyas by her guru HH Pujya Swami Chidanand Saraswatiji and has been living at Parmarth Niketan Ashram for the past twenty-five years.

The Prefrontal Cortex (PFC): The thinking brain. The PFC is the brain’s executive hub, responsible for higher-level functions like decision-making, social behavior, and problem-solving. In a harmonious state, it acts as a “wise manager”, regulating, interpreting and managing the holistic awareness received from the right hemisphere.

The Amygdala:

The vigilant “alarm system.” Located within the ancient limbic system, the amygdala rapidly detects threats to survival and triggers the “fight-or-flight” responses. In a calm state, the prefrontal cortex effectively dampens the amygdala’s activity. When the amygdala is not hijacked by a threatening perception, it allows the rest of the brain to operate without being dominated by an anxious emergency response.

Interconnectivity: The “harmonious link.” Strong, healthy neural connections between the PFC and the right hemisphere are crucial for this calm mood, or state of mind. This allows for what is called “top-down regulation,” where the thinking brain can calmly process and regulate emotions originating from the feeling brain.

A simple analogy

Imagine a car’s dashboard with colorful happy emoji faces when all is functioning together smoothly.

The Right Hemisphere is a holistic sense of all conditions. It continuously provides raw, real-time data about the car’s state of being in the present flow motion. It is simply aware of the present flow without judging it.

The Amygdala is a threat-detection buzzer. When something is wrong, like an engine overheating, it blares loudly to get your immediate attention.

The Prefrontal Cortex is the driver. When everything is running normally (no triggered trauma), the driver calmly observes the happy dashboard (right hemisphere). If the engine starts to overheat (amygdala alarm), the driver uses their experience and calm decision-making (PFC) to slow down, pull over, and check the engine, rather than panicking and jumping out of the car.

Harmony is the experience of a smooth, uninterrupted ride where the driver confidently operates the vehicle while mindfully attending to the journey, knowing the dashboard emojis are reliable and the alarm system is only for true emergencies.

How mindfulness nurtures this harmony

Mindfulness practices are a key way to train your brain to strengthen the connections that support this calm, integrated state.

It tames the amygdala. By mindfully labeling an emotion (e.g., “I’m feeling anger”), you engage the frontal lobe (PFC), which then calms the amygdala. Over time, this consistent practice can reduce the amygdala’s size and reactivity, making it less likely to sound a false alarm.

Practicing mindfulness boosts the PFC.  Regular mindfulness practice has been shown to thicken the prefrontal cortex, enhancing its ability to regulate emotions and focus attention.

It improves interoception. Mindfulness, which involves directing attention to internal body sensations, helps strengthen the right hemisphere’s awareness of our inner state in a non-judgmental way. This heightened awareness provides the PFC with more accurate information, improving its ability to regulate emotion.

It rewires for calm. Consistently practicing mindfulness, such as focusing on your breath, strengthens the neural pathways that support present-moment awareness. This helps your brain shift out of anxious, future-focused states or ruminative, past-focused states and into a calm, balanced “now”.

Left Brain story (narrative):

Sequential thinking, time-based scarcity, vigilant evaluation, comparison, justification for conflict, and separation. But the very fact that we are reading this illuminates something deeper is stirring within us.

Your right brain awareness is not absent – it’s simply been overshadowed by the left brain’s busy activity. This awareness exists beyond time, beyond judgment, beyond the need to constantly achieve or become something more.

Carl Jung recognized this as ‘a priori’ – the eternal Self that exists before all learned behaviors and conditioning.  It’s not something you need to develop; it’s something you need to uncover and live.

Begin by noticing any moments – however brief – of peace, beauty, or simple presence. These are glimpses of your true nature: the infinite, eternal awareness that is your birthright and the source of all genuine satisfaction.

How do I calm my limbic system?

Overview

To calm the limbic system, which controls emotional responses, you can practice mindfulness and meditation, engage in deep breathing exercises, and participate in regular physical activity.  Other strategies include engaging your senses with practices like aromatherapy or focusing on a small, tasty food item, improving your diet by eating nutritious, whole foods, ensuring quality sleep, and connecting with supportive relationships and enjoyable activities.

Mind-Body Practices

Mindfulness and Meditation: Focus on the present moment to foster calm and reduce stress.

Deep Breathing: Slow, deep breaths can activate the body’s relaxation response and lower blood pressure.

Exercise: Regular physical activity releases endorphins, increases serotonin, and helps use up excess adrenaline.
Yoga and Qigong: These practices combine movement, breath, and awareness to promote relaxation and calm the nervous system.

Tapping (EFT): Acupoint stimulation through tapping can relieve emotional stress by stimulating specific points on the body.

Lifestyle Adjustments

Healthy Diet: Consume well-balanced, whole foods, including sufficient protein and healthy fats, to support gut health and overall well-being.

Quality Sleep: Establish a consistent sleep routine, avoid blue screens before bed, and eat lighter meals before sleep.

Social Connection: Spend time with people you enjoy and build healthy relationships to foster emotional support.

Engage Your Senses: Pay attention to sights, sounds, smells, and tastes (like an ice chip or a specific food) to ground yourself in the present moment.

Therapeutic and Behavioral Strategies:

Positive Distraction: Shift your attention to pleasant thoughts or activities when stressed.

Brain Retraining: Learn techniques to consciously interrupt and change patterns of stress responses.

Aromatherapy: Use essential oils to improve mood, as the sense of smell directly influences the limbic system.

How to activate the prefrontal cortex?

Overview

To activate and strengthen your prefrontal cortex, you can engage in cognitive activities like learning new skills, doing puzzles, and playing word games. Regular physical exercise boosts blood flow to the brain, while prioritizing sufficient sleep, maintaining a balanced diet, and practicing mindfulness or reflection also support its executive functions.

Focusing on goal-directed behaviors, practicing impulse control, and fostering optimism can also be effective strategies.

Cognitive & Mental Activities

Learn something new: Taking up a new hobby or learning a new language can fire up neurons in your brain.

Play brain games: Engage in activities like chess, Sudoku, jigsaw puzzles, and memory games to challenge your brain.

Practice language skills: Strengthen your speech and writing abilities, such as through journaling or playing word games like Scrabble.

Set goals: Work on goal-directed activities and use to-do lists to practice focus and planning.

Develop inhibition: Practice saying “no” to small temptations to strengthen your impulse control.

Lifestyle & Physical Strategies

Exercise regularly: Physical activity increases blood flow to the brain, activating the prefrontal cortex and enhancing cognitive function. Even short bursts of movement can help.

Prioritize sleep: Getting enough quality sleep is crucial for overall brain health and the proper functioning of the prefrontal cortex.

Eat a healthy diet: A balanced diet supports your brain’s health and cognitive abilities.

Mindfulness & Emotional Well-being

Engage in reflection: Create opportunities for self-awareness and reflection, which can activate the prefrontal cortex and foster growth.

Cultivate optimism: Positive thinking and creating a positive future story are linked to dopamine release, which engages the brain.

Practice mindfulness: Activities that promote a sense of security and openness can help activate the prefrontal cortex.

In Internal Family Systems (IFS), Courage is a core quality of the Self, which is seen as a person’s wise and compassionate spiritual essence. A Self-led system operates with courage, allowing one to face difficult emotions and memories needed for deep healing.

The spiritual dimension of IFS

 

IFS is often considered a deeply spiritual practice because the qualities of the Self resonate with universal spiritual teachings.

Spirit as Self: Many IFS practitioners and clients experience the Self as a spiritual essence or higher self. This wise, inner presence is viewed as a source of healing that is inherently undamaged and always available.

Healing with the Self: The Self’s qualities, including courage, are used to create a safe, non-judgmental space for wounded parts of the personality (called Exiles) to be witnessed and healed. This is analogous to the compassion and forgiveness emphasized in many spiritual traditions.

Connection to a greater whole: By fostering harmony within one’s internal system, IFS also creates a sense of interconnectedness with others and the world. This can lead to a deeper sense of purpose and meaning, similar to a spiritual awakening.

Self-led courage in action

Courage in IFS is not about the absence of fear; rather, it is the strength that allows the Self to be present with parts that are experiencing fear or pain.

Facing exiled parts: The protective parts (Managers and Firefighters) of the internal system work hard to hide traumatized and vulnerable Exiles. It takes courage to approach these long-suppressed parts and witness their stories and pain without being overwhelmed.

Facing protectors’ fears: Protective parts, like an anxious Manager or an addicted Firefighter, will fear what will happen if the pain of the Exile is released. The Self’s courage reassures these parts that it is safe to step back and allow for healing.

Embodying courage: In IFS, courageous action involves the Self leading the internal system to confront difficult emotions, rather than a protective part forcing a bravado that isn’t authentic. This allows for healing and for parts to return to their natural, non-extreme roles.

How the concepts work together:

For an IFS explorer, the sequence of connecting these concepts might look like this:

Access the Self: Through practices like mindfulness or meditation, a person accesses their core Self, often experienced as a calm, compassionate, and wise inner presence—a connection to their spirit.

Access Courage: With the Self in the lead, they access the courage to turn toward an inner part that is causing distress, such as an Inner Critic or a Perfectionist.

Engage the Part: With curiosity and compassion, the person asks the protective part what it fears and what it is protecting. For example, a perfectionist part might reveal it is trying to prevent the humiliation that a younger Exile experienced.

Heal the Exile: The Self, with courage, can then turn to the exiled, wounded part and offer the acceptance, love, and compassion it never received, allowing it to unburden its pain. This act of Self-led courage, witnessing the pain and offering love, is how healing occurs in the IFS model.

 

IFS & Spiritualiy:

Some people interpret the story of Jesus Christ as a spiritual metaphor for the inner psychological journey toward wholeness, which aligns with key concepts of Richard Schwartz’s Internal Family Systems (IFS) model. In this metaphorical view, Jesus can be seen as the Self, while his disciples and other figures represent the psyche’s various parts.

The IFS framework

Developed by Richard Schwartz, IFS posits that the mind is made up of multiple “parts” (sub-personalities). A core concept is the compassionate, wise, and undamaged “Self” that exists at the core of every individual. The goal of IFS is to help a person become “Self-led,” so the Self can heal the individual’s wounded and protective parts. The hope in time is for the greater integration of all parts into the Self, so they can relate harmoniously. This involves acknowledging, understanding, and healing our exiled parts and their protectors.

Parallels between the Jesus story and IFS

Jesus as the Self: In the IFS framework, the Self is a compassionate, wise, and healing presence. Some interpretations view Jesus in a similar way:

He is the center of the system. Like the IFS Self, Jesus is the leader and compassionate core around which the other figures (parts) revolve.

He is a source of healing. Jesus’s miracles can be seen as a metaphor for the Self’s ability to heal and unburden the traumatized parts of the psyche.

He exemplifies wholeness. The death of Jesus and his resurrection can be interpreted as the death of the ego (the false self) and the subsequent resurrection of the true, whole Self.

The Disciples as Protective Parts: The twelve disciples can be seen as an inner “family” of parts, each with its own role, strengths, and fears.

Peter as the Manager: Peter is often impulsive, outspoken, and attempts to protect Jesus, even to the point of denial and resistance. This mirrors a “manager” part in IFS, which uses controlling behavior to preemptively prevent pain and maintain a sense of order.

Judas as the Exile: Judas’s betrayal and subsequent despair can be viewed as a deeply wounded and exiled part that feels unlovable and acts out its pain.

The other disciples: The varying strengths, jealousies, and weaknesses of the other disciples represent the full range of human experience contained within an internal system.

The Path of Healing and Integration: The larger narrative of Jesus’s life, death, and resurrection parallels the IFS process of healing and integration:

Calling the parts: Jesus calls his disciples to follow him, much like the Self in IFS “calls” the different parts to engage in the healing process.

Witnessing the wounded parts: Just as Jesus models radical compassion for all people, the Self in IFS must witness its wounded parts with gentleness, curiosity, and non-judgment.

Unburdening the pain: The suffering and sacrifice of the cross can be seen as a metaphorical unburdening of all the pain and sin (the burdens in IFS) that the internal parts are carrying.

Achieving Self-Leadership: The story’s ultimate goal is for the disciples to become like Jesus, just as the IFS goal is for the parts to learn to trust the Self to lead the system, leading to greater inner peace and wholeness.

Calmness:

When humans are calm, the right brain (associated with emotions and intuition) and the prefrontal cortex (the center for rational thought) work together, with the prefrontal cortex managing emotional responses. This top-down regulation allows us to stay grounded in the present moment, rather than being hijacked by instinctual fear from the amygdala and past trauma.

The brain’s architecture for calm and clarity

Think of your brain as a well-managed organization with two key players:

The amygdala (alarm system): This is the brain’s “security guard” and emotional core, wired to detect threats and initiate the fast-acting “fight or flight” response. When a threat (real or perceived) appears, it gets to work instantly.

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) (executive suite): As the brain’s executive command center, the PFC is responsible for higher-level functions like rational thought, emotional regulation, and decision-making. It is slower and more methodical than the amygdala.

When we are calm, the PFC is in charge. It sends inhibitory signals to the amygdala, dampening its activity and preventing an emotional overreaction. This is often called “top-down regulation.” In this state, the brain works harmoniously:

The right hemisphere, with its strong emotional processing, can express itself, but it is moderated by the rational, executive functioning of the PFC.

There is a balance, not a conflict, between these parts of the brain. You can feel your emotions without being overwhelmed by them.

What happens during an “amygdala hijack”

When the amygdala is triggered—especially by past trauma—it overrides the prefrontal cortex. This is known as an “amygdala hijack,” and it leads to an intense emotional reaction that is out of proportion to the situation at hand.

A fast, overwhelming response: The amygdala takes the reins and floods the body with stress hormones. You react on instinct, bypassing conscious thought.

Emotional flooding: The right hemisphere’s emotional output becomes intense and overwhelming because it is not being properly regulated by the rational prefrontal cortex.

Past trauma resurfaces: The amygdala links new information to past traumatic events, causing your body to relive the fear as if the past is happening again.

How to cultivate harmony and stay present:

You can strengthen the connection between your prefrontal cortex and your amygdala to stay grounded and calm. This is possible due to neuroplasticity, your brain’s ability to change and adapt.

Mindfulness meditation: Regular practice can calm the amygdala while strengthening the prefrontal cortex and the neural pathways connecting them. It helps you stay grounded by focusing on the present moment.

Deep, slow breathing: This is your direct line to the nervous system. Extending your exhale engages your parasympathetic nervous system, which promotes a state of “rest and digest” rather than “fight or flight”.

Affect labeling: When you feel an intense emotion, consciously identifying and naming it (“I feel anxious,” or “This is anger”) activates the prefrontal cortex. This simple act of verbalizing your feelings can decrease amygdala activity.

Grounding techniques: When you feel overwhelmed, bring your focus to your five senses. Notice five things you can see, four things you can touch, three things you can hear, two things you can smell, and one thing you can taste. This pulls you out of a fear-based spiral and anchors you in the present.

Physical activity: Exercise is proven to reduce stress hormones and improve your mood, helping to regulate the amygdala’s activity.

The key mechanism involves the prefrontal cortex’s “top-down” inhibitory control over the amygdala, which is foundational to emotional regulation and a state of calm awareness.

Key theories, proof, and evidence include:

Polyvagal Theory

Developed by Stephen Porges, PhD, this theory describes how the autonomic nervous system—especially the vagus nerve—regulates our physiological and emotional states.

Ventral Vagal Complex: In a state of safety and connection, the “smart vagus nerve,” originating from the nucleus ambiguus, is dominant. This system inhibits the more primitive threat responses of the sympathetic nervous system and the dorsal vagal system.

Calm and connection: This ventral vagal state is characterized by feelings of safety and support, which facilitate the brain’s highest functions, including social engagement, creativity, and the calm, present-moment awareness associated with a harmonious right brain and prefrontal cortex.

Top-down emotional regulation:

Evidence from numerous fMRI studies has established the prefrontal cortex (PFC) as a key player in the cognitive regulation of emotion.

PFC-amygdala pathway: The PFC, particularly regions like the medial and orbitofrontal cortex, has reciprocal interconnections with the limbic system, which includes the amygdala. This circuit is responsible for assessing threats and deploying strategies that reduce negative emotional experiences.

Inhibitory control: When an emotional trigger appears, the amygdala signals a potential threat. A healthy, non-traumatized nervous system responds by activating the PFC, which sends inhibitory signals to quiet the amygdala. This “top-down” control prevents the amygdala’s fear-based responses from taking over.

Developmental aspect: This PFC-amygdala circuitry develops over a long period in humans. Early experiences of caregiving and safety are critical for forming the pathways needed for effective emotional regulation later in life.

Neuroscience of mindfulness

Extensive research on mindfulness meditation provides direct evidence for how intentional focus on the present moment reinforces calm neural pathways.

Rebalancing brain activity: Mindfulness training has been shown to decrease amygdala activity and increase activity in the prefrontal cortex. This strengthens the brain’s capacity for top-down control.

Structural changes: Long-term mindfulness practice is associated with measurable structural changes in the brain, including increased gray matter density in regions associated with attention, emotional regulation, and perspective-taking.

The Default Mode Network (DMN): A calm, present-moment state is associated with a decrease in the DMN, a neural network active during mind-wandering and self-referential thought.

Hemisphere lateralization (right brain vs. left brain)

While the idea of a “right-brain/left-brain” dichotomy is well known, new research does indicate different tendencies between the hemispheres that become harmonized in a calm state.

Processing emotional information: The right hemisphere is generally more involved in processing raw, emotional, and sensory information, especially in response to potential threat.

Left PFC and positive emotion: Studies have linked greater activity in the left prefrontal cortex to positive feelings and a sense of reward.

Balanced state: In a calm and integrated state, the brain is not dominated by either hemisphere’s tendencies. Instead, the prefrontal cortex facilitates cross-hemispheric communication, allowing for the integration of emotional awareness (right brain) with rational control and a sense of reward (left brain).

Neuroception (a Polyvagal concept)

This process, which occurs unconsciously in the nervous system, is distinct from conscious perception.

Unconscious risk assessment: The nervous system is constantly scanning for cues of safety, danger, or life-threat in the environment and in internal bodily sensations. This happens automatically, below the level of conscious awareness.

Shifting states: When the nervous system neuroceptively detects cues of safety, it allows the ventral vagal system to dominate, creating a physiological state of calm. Conversely, if it detects danger, it will instinctively shift into a state of fight/flight or freeze.

Trauma’s impact: A history of trauma can “miscalibrate” a person’s neuroception, causing them to perceive threat even when the environment is safe. This keeps the defensive systems primed, making it difficult for the PFC and vagus nerve to promote a calm, present state.

Calming the amygdala:

Mindfulness and meditation practices have been shown to calm the amygdala, the brain’s “alarm signal” for stress and fear.

Strengthening the prefrontal cortex: Practices like mindfulness strengthen the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for emotional regulation and executive functions.

Fostering present-moment awareness: The goal of present-moment awareness is typically achieved in a safe and regulated state.

IFS nourishes the way our right brain and pre-frontal cortex function harmoniously in the present moment, when we are not triggered by exiled memories of past trauma and amygdala protective reflexes.

In Internal Family Systems, accessing the calm and compassionate core “Self” allows the brain’s executive and emotional functions to work in harmony. This integrated state, free from the hijacking of the amygdala by past trauma, enables clear and present-moment functioning.

Detailed options

IFS facilitates a state of whole-brain integration, where the core Self, characterized by calmness and clarity, leads the internal system. This state is achieved by healing traumatized “parts” and calming the fear-processing amygdala, allowing for the harmonious function of the prefrontal cortex and other brain regions in the present moment.

Internal Family Systems (IFS)  teaches individuals how to access the calm, compassionate core “Self” that exists within them. By approaching and healing the parts carrying emotional burdens from past trauma, the Self can help to regulate the nervous system. This process calms the overactive amygdala and strengthens the function of the prefrontal cortex, which in turn restores inner harmony and allows for present-moment awareness, free from the influence of past triggers.

IFS is a way of “rewiring” the brain by putting your calm, centered Self back in the driver’s seat of your life. When we are triggered by old trauma, a protective part linked to the fear-center (amygdala) hijacks our system, and we lose access to our clear-thinking prefrontal cortex. Through IFS, we develop a relationship with these protective parts, helping them feel safe enough to relax. This allows our Self to lead, restoring balance and enabling us to respond calmly and creatively in the timeless present, rather than reactively from the past.

Key concepts from IFS and neuroscience

Self: In IFS, the Self is the core of who you are, inherently calm, compassionate, and wise. It is the leadership that the IFS aims to restore.

Parts: Your psyche is made of multiple “parts” or sub-personalities. Some parts (Exiles) hold trauma and pain, while other parts (Protectors, including Managers and Firefighters) act to keep that pain from resurfacing, sometimes in extreme or unhealthy ways.

Amygdala: This brain region is responsible for the “fight-or-flight” response. In trauma survivors, it is often hyperactive and can trigger strong reactions even when there is no real threat. IFS can help calm the amygdala.

Prefrontal Cortex (PFC): This area is responsible for executive functions like rational thinking, decision-making, and emotional regulation. When the amygdala is in control, the PFC’s function is compromised. The IFS process enhances PFC function.

Present Timeless Moment: This concept in your original idea aligns with the IFS goal of bringing presence and perspective. The healing process allows individuals to relate to past events without being overwhelmed, grounding them in the present.

Neuroplasticity: IFS helps the brain form new, healthier neural pathways by creating repeated moments of internal safety, self-compassion, and connection.

IFS promotes neuroplasticity, the brain’s ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections. Repeated experiences of self-compassion and calm connection with our parts can replace old, rigid survival strategies.

Bottom-up healing: By focusing on the subconscious processes of the parts, IFS helps release the emotional “burdens” that are often held in the nervous system and body. This “bottom-up” approach contrasts with “top-down” approaches like CBT, which focus on conscious thought patterns.

Somatic Awareness: Because trauma is also stored in the body, IFS uses somatic awareness (noticing body sensations) to help access cues from parts. For example, a tightening in the chest might be the signal of a fearful Exiled part.

Internal Family Systems (IFS) supports harmonious function between the right brain (involved in emotion, image, and sensation) and the prefrontal cortex (involved in logic and planning) by accessing and strengthening the “Self,” a core of calmness and compassion. When the nervous system is regulated, the Self can lead, creating a calm and integrated internal system.

This process works as follows:

The brain in a triggered state: When a person is triggered, the amygdala (part of the brain’s “emotional center”) becomes overactive, sending out a distress signal. This can lead the brain to transfer control from the higher-functioning prefrontal cortex to more reactive, primitive brain structures, triggering a fight, flight, or freeze response. Trauma survivors often have a hyperactive amygdala, which makes them highly reactive to triggers.

The brain in a harmonious state: When the nervous system is regulated, the prefrontal cortex can coordinate with the brain’s emotional centers, rather than being hijacked by them. The IFS model refers to this state as “Self-led,” guided by the Self’s innate qualities such as calm, curiosity, and compassion.

IFS bridges the gap: IFS provides a “bottom-up” approach to healing that works with the subconscious and the right brain. By creating a safe internal environment, IFS facilitates memory reconsolidation and neuroplasticity, allowing the brain to reorganize itself and create healthier neural pathways.

IFS strengthens right-brain and prefrontal cortex harmony by:

Connecting with the Self IFS helps individuals access the “Self”—a core of compassion, curiosity, and calm. This experience of centeredness creates a safe internal state from which to process pain without being overwhelmed. From a neurobiological perspective, the Self may represent a state of balanced whole-brain communication.

Creating separation from triggered parts IFS helps individuals “unblend” from their triggered parts by viewing them with curiosity and compassion, rather than being completely overtaken by the emotion. This creates a space between the Self (guided by the prefrontal cortex) and the reactive part (driven by the amygdala), enabling a more balanced and intentional response.

Befriending and soothing protective parts: The connection involves building a relationship with the defensive parts (“managers” and “firefighters”) and understanding their protective intentions. As protective parts feel heard and trusted, they can relax from their extreme roles. This reduces the nervous system’s high-alert state, allowing for greater peace and regulation.

Healing exiled parts By creating internal safety, IFS allows the Self to access and “unburden” the core wounds of exiled parts—the parts holding trauma, pain, and shame. This process releases the painful emotions and beliefs, freeing the exiled part and allowing the whole system to calm down.

Integrating somatic awareness, IFS incorporates bodily sensations to access the deeper emotions and memories held by parts. This mind-body connection addresses trauma on a neurological level, allowing the nervous system to process and release old patterns.

In psychology, the right hemisphere of the brain is primarily associated with creative, intuitive, and holistic thinking, as well as spatial awareness, emotional response, and processing non-verbal cues. Key functions include imagination, art, music, face recognition, and understanding communication context, though it’s important to remember that both hemispheres work together, rather than operating independently.

Key Functions of the Right Hemisphere

Creativity and Imagination: The right hemisphere is central to artistic endeavors, imaginative thought, and novel ideas.

Spatial Awareness: It plays a crucial role in navigating the environment, understanding spatial relationships, and processing visual information.

Emotional Processing: The right brain is linked to how we experience and respond to both positive and negative emotions.

Holistic Thinking: This hemisphere is responsible for “big-picture” thinking, seeing patterns, and making connections between different elements.

Intuition and Common Sense: It contributes to instincts and intuition, helping us understand things without explicit reasoning.

Processing Non-Verbal Communication: The right hemisphere is skilled at interpreting body language, facial expressions, and the subtle cues in communication.

Facial Expressions and Emotion Recognition: The right hemisphere is crucial for recognizing emotions from facial expressions and prosody (the emotional tone of speech).

Imagery and Nonverbal Communication: The right hemisphere plays a significant role in processing and generating nonverbal forms of communication, including emotional expressions.

Music and Art: It’s involved in appreciating musical aesthetics and processing elements like rhythm.

Corpus Callosum:

The corpus callosum is a thick band of nerve fibers that connects the two hemispheres of the brain.

Its primary function is to facilitate communication and information transfer between the hemispheres, enabling them to work together seamlessly.

Specific Functions:

Sensory and Motor Integration: The corpus callosum transmits sensory information (e.g., touch, vision, hearing) from one hemisphere to the other, allowing for coordinated movements and responses.

Cognitive Function: It plays a crucial role in higher-level cognitive processes such as attention, memory, language, and problem-solving by enabling the two hemispheres to share and process information collaboratively.

Interhemispheric Transfer: The corpus callosum allows information from one hemisphere to be transferred to the other, enabling the brain to integrate information from both sides.

Emotional Regulation: It contributes to the regulation of emotions by facilitating communication between the emotional centers in the two hemispheres.

Visual Perception: The splenium, the posterior part of the corpus callosum, is involved in integrating visual information from the two hemispheres, allowing for a unified perception of the visual world.

In summary, the corpus callosum is essential for coordinating brain function, enabling the two hemispheres to work together effectively in processing sensory information, performing motor tasks, and supporting complex cognitive and emotional processes.

A neurological understanding of the Internal Family Systems (IFS) model connects the roles of managers, firefighters, and exiles to specific functions of key brain regions and hemispheric dynamics. This perspective helps explain how trauma can disrupt the brain’s internal “orchestra” and how IFS dialogs restore harmony through neuroplasticity.

The Self and the brain:

The IFS concept of the “Self” represents a state of calm, curiosity, and compassionate leadership — a core essence that is undamaged by trauma. From a neurobiological perspective, the Self corresponds to an integrated state of whole-brain functioning.

Prefrontal Cortex (PFC): This brain region, especially the medial prefrontal cortex, is responsible for higher-level functions such as observation, emotional regulation, and perspective-taking. When the Self is in the lead, the PFC is active, allowing for calm, clear-headed processing rather than a reactive, part-driven response.

Whole-brain integration: The Self can be viewed as the nervous system in a state of balance. It fosters integrated communication between the logical left brain, the “feeling/awareness” right brain, and the deeper emotional centers deep within the limbic system.

 

Managers and the prefrontal cortex

Manager parts are proactive protectors that try to keep the system safe by preventing exiled pain from being triggered. Neurobiologically, they can be seen as utilizing the cognitive functions of the prefrontal cortex in extreme or rigid ways.

Overactive PFC: When managers are in charge, the PFC works overtime in rigid patterns of control, planning, and suppression. This can lead to hyper-vigilance, perfectionism, and workaholism, which are all attempts to maintain control and avoid vulnerability.

Cognitive biases: These managers, through their control of the PFC, can produce distorted thinking patterns and beliefs to maintain their protection. For example, a manager might create the belief “If I am not perfect, I will be rejected,” to prevent the system from experiencing shame.

Firefighters and the amygdala

Firefighter parts are reactive protectors that activate when exiled pain is triggered, seeking to extinguish emotional pain immediately through impulsive or addictive behavior. This quick-reacting role is strongly linked to the brain’s “fight-or-flight” response system.

Amygdala hijack: The amygdala is the brain’s fear and threat detection center. When an exile is triggered, the amygdala can become hyperactive, causing a rapid, intense emotional response. Firefighters emerge to “douse the flames” of this overwhelming feeling, often by overriding the logical PFC.

Brainstem and body response: The rapid, reactive nature of firefighters also involves the brainstem, which controls immediate stress responses like the release of stress hormones. These parts can be associated with substance use, binge eating, or reckless behaviors that distract from emotional pain.

Exiles and the implicit memory system

Exiles are parts that carry the burdens of past trauma and painful emotions like shame, fear, and worthlessness. These burdens are often stored as implicit memories—those we experience through feelings and sensations without a conscious narrative.

Hippocampus and implicit memory: The hippocampus is crucial for memory formation, but in trauma, it can be compromised. Traumatic experiences can prevent narrative memory from being properly encoded, leaving the event stored as fragmented emotional and sensory impressions. Exiles are, in effect, these frozen, implicitly held experiences.

Amygdala activation: When a present-day event triggers an exile, the amygdala is activated, causing the body to feel as if the original trauma is happening again, even if the person cannot consciously recall the event.

Trauma, the left brain, and the right brain

Trauma profoundly impacts the communication between the brain’s two hemispheres, affecting how an individual processes their experience.

Right brain activation: Traumatic events are processed and stored in the right hemisphere, the side responsible for emotions, sensory experience, and non-verbal communication. Trauma leaves an imprint of intense feelings and physical sensations in the right brain.

Left brain deactivation: During and after trauma, the left hemisphere, which is responsible for logic, language, and sequencing, can shut down (freeze). This is why survivors often have trouble putting their traumatic experience into a coherent story. The rational, analytical functions are compromised, leaving the emotional and sensory experience stored in a fragmented way.

IFS framework as integration:

Through the practice of compassionate dialogue and understanding each part’s story, IFS helps us to calm and reintegrate the left brain. As the Self creates a safe space for exiles to be heard, the emotional (right brain) and narrative (left brain) parts of the memory can be reintegrated, leading to healing and coherence.

How integration with IFS works neurobiologically

The IFS process directly influences the brain’s ability to change and heal, a phenomenon known as neuroplasticity.

Safety first: By developing Self-energy, the client activates the calming, regulating functions of the PFC, which helps to calm the hyperactive amygdala and create a felt sense of safety.

Memory reconsolidation: IFS helps parts with burdened beliefs to reactivate their neural networks in a safe environment. The parts then experience a new, disconfirming emotional experience with the Self. This process of memory reconsolidation allows the brain to “rewrite” the old, painful memories and integrate them in a healthier way.

Whole-system harmony: Through this practice, the brain’s internal system becomes more integrated. The managers and firefighters can relax their extreme roles, the exiles are unburdened, and the Self can lead with more clarity and compassion, leading to lasting neurological and emotional changes.

 

What if dominating colonizers govern Earth?


 

…:: “Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. 
I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I’m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. 
That’s what’s insane about it. ~John Lennon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLaLvALHmEU

..::” It is no measure of health… to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick (egoic) society.”
~ Jiddu Krishnamurti

 

 

..::”The finest emotion of which we are capable is the mystic emotion. Herein lies the seed of all art and all true science. Anyone to whom this feeling is alien, who is no longer capable of wonderment and lives in a state of fear is already dead. ~Albert Einstein

 

 

..::”Refusing humility traps you in delusion.
People will convince themselves they are fighting you…
…while being blind to the fact that it was never actually about you—
—it has actually been a one-sided beef with their Creator all along.
This is why we say, “Don’t kill the messenger ♡
Poetess gina näuman • جینا نعمان @entertheunseen

orwell_war

..::”Nobody in the world, nobody in history, has ever gotten their freedom by appealing to the moral sense of people who are oppressing them.

 
Assata_Shakur

Active Listening

We Think We Listen, but that might be a thought!

https://empathymatters.org/now/active-listening-carl-rogers/

Understanding this could greatly reduce human suffering.

https://empathymatters.org/now/ifs-spirit/

https://empathymatters.org/now/how-evil-triumphs

Universal Declaration for Peace and Human Dignity:

We, the people, recognizing our shared humanity and interconnected destiny, do hereby affirm and declare:

https://empathymatters.org/now/universal-declaration-for-peace-and-human-dignity/

 

“All war is a symptom

of man’s failure

as a thinking animal.”

 

~John Steinbeck

 

War is not an inevitable outcome, but a result of man’s proud refusal to use reason, dialogue, and empathy to explore strategies that meet everyone’s needs.

It implies that resorting to fear and violence is a regression from our natural potential for peaceful thought, and that peaceful solutions are the hallmark of a truly evolved, intelligent species.

A failure of reason: The quote proposes that war is a failure of human intellect because it replaces rational problem-solving with physical aggression rooted in a mentality of domination.

A symptom, not a cause: Steinbeck frames war as a symptom of a deeper human failing—the refusal to resolve disputes through more thoughtful means like diplomacy and understanding.

An appeal to higher potential: The quote serves as a challenge to humanity, encouraging the elevation of our thinking beyond fear and conflict toward a more peaceful life on Earth.

War is not a sign of strength: In this view, war is a sign of weakness in the ability to manage fear, resulting in destructive reactions over a selfish, feverish. squeamish, fear of sharing.

🌺❤🌺“The finest emotion of which we are capable is the mystic emotion. Herein lies the seed of all art and all true science. Anyone to whom this feeling is alien, who is no longer capable of wonderment and lives in a state of fear is already dead. ~Albert Einstein
.
🌺❤🌺”Refusing humility traps you in delusion.
~People will convince themselves they are fighting you…
~while being blind to the fact that it was never actually about you…
~it has actually been a one-sided beef with their Creator all along.
~This is why we say, “Don’t kill the messenger ♡🌺❤🌺
.
🌺❤🌺 Love Albert Einstein 🌺 … Only a comic book bible would suggest a cultish behavior to genoc~~ everyone else, but some special chosen ones? OMG
 

 

“Hurt people hurt people.” 

… “That’s how pain patterns get passed on, generation after generation after generation.  Break the chain today.  Meet anger with empathy, contempt with compassion, cruelty with kindness.  Greet grimaces with smiles.  Forgive and forget about finding fault.  Love is the weapon of the future.” ~Yehuda Berg

The full quote expands on this idea, suggesting that to break the cycle, one should meet anger with empathy, contempt with compassion, and cruelty with kindness.

This concept suggests that individuals who have experienced pain or trauma may unconsciously pass on that hurt to others, creating a cycle that can only be broken through a conscious choice to respond with compassion and forgiveness.

The core idea: People who are in pain tend to inflict pain on others, passing on negative patterns across generations.

The solution: The quote proposes a path to break this cycle.

Meet anger with empathy.

Respond to contempt with compassion.

Counter cruelty with kindness.

Let go of the need to find fault and practice forgiveness.

The outcome: The quote ends with the powerful statement, “Love is the weapon of the future,” suggesting that love and compassion are the tools to stop this cycle.

Yehuda Berg: was born in Israel, is the author of many books on Kabbalah. He led the Kabbalah Centre until 2014.

Philip Berg: Yehuda Berg’s father, who was an Israeli rabbi, founded the Kabbalah Centre in Israel and then moved to the United States.

Yehuda Berg grew up in a Jewish environment and received a kabbalistic education by his father and an orthodox rabbinic ordination from a rabbinic seminary in Israel. As an active contributor of the Kabbalah Centre since the 1990s, he has developed his own Kabbalah interpretation focusing on self-improvement and healing, and has coached many Kabbalah Centre students, including some celebrities. In 2004, Yehuda Berg became co-director of the Kabbalah Centre.

 

 

..::”Nobody in the world, nobody in history, has ever gotten their freedom by appealing to the moral sense of people who are oppressing them. ~Assata Shakur

 

On an individual level,
healing strategies include:
 

  • Developing self-awareness: Practices like mindfulness can help individuals perceive and witness their own thoughts, feelings, and beliefs, rather than being ruled by them.

     

  • Finding safe spaces: Processing emotional pain requires a safe environment, whether through talking with a trusted person, a support group, or a mental health professional.

     

  • Creating a new narrative: By exploring and sharing one’s trauma story, it becomes less upsetting. This can happen through writing or speaking with trusted individuals.

     

  • Practicing self-regulation: Techniques such as deep breathing, meditation, and physical activity can help regulate the nervous system and calm the “fight, flight, or freeze” response.

     

  • Active Choice: Individuals can choose to break the cycle by seeking healing, forgiveness, and a living relationship with Self, thereby creating a different path for their own and future generations.

 

Using Internal Family Systems (IFS) terminology, Matthew 6:24 illustrates the conflict of a person’s “Self” being torn between two competing “Protectors” or “Exiles”: the “God” part and the “Mammon” (MONEY/materialism) part.

A person cannot fully serve both, as each has a different agenda that creates internal conflict, forcing the Self to choose which to prioritize to avoid being overwhelmed by one’s own divided system.

This is because “Mammon/MONEY” operates as an external and potentially idolatrous “Protector” seeking security, while the “God” part represents a deeper spiritual “Witness” that can be neglected when “Mammon/MONEY” rules.

Key concepts in IFS terms

 

Conflicting parts:

The “God” part and the “Mammon” part are presented as two opposing managers or leaders within a person’s system. One is a part focused on spiritual and eternal things, while the other is a part focused on material wealth and security.

 

Protector vs. Self:

 

When a person tries to serve both, it’s because “Mammon/MONEY” is acting as a “Protector” part, attempting to provide a sense of safety and worth. This creates an internal conflict with the “Self,” which is the core of the person’s being that should be in charge.

 

Divided allegiance:

The scripture highlights that a divided heart is unsustainable. A person cannot maintain equal loyalty to two opposing “masters” because the “Protectors” demand different actions and have conflicting goals. One will be loved while the other is despised, leading to internal “hatred” or resentment.

 

The choice:

The choice is not between being rich and being poor, but between which part has ultimate authority. Serving God is the way to achieve ultimate security, as it allows the “Self” to be in charge, while serving “Mammon” means the “Protector” takes over and exerts control over the person’s life.

 

Exile and unburdening:

Choosing “God” over “Mammon” is a path of “unburdening” the “Mammon” part, as the person’s security and worth are not dependent on material possessions. This allows the “Self” to lead and the “Mammon” part to be seen as a tool rather than the master.

 

 

We The People Want Peace: 

“So what prevents Peace Now?

Unconscious, unhealed trauma projected onto “others”.

  

AI REPLY:

The idea that unconscious, unhealed trauma is a key barrier to peace suggests that external conflicts often mirror internal struggles. When individuals and groups carry unresolved emotional pain, they may project that pain onto “others,” creating cycles of misunderstanding, fear, and violence. This concept can be applied to both interpersonal relationships and large-scale international conflicts.
 

How unconscious, unhealed trauma prevents peace:

 

    • Creates a cycle of aggression: People “at war with themselves” often cause collateral damage to those around them. Unhealed pain can manifest as anger, insecurity, and a need for control, which can be projected onto others who then feel hurt and react defensively. In group settings, this dynamic escalates, turning shame and rage into collective cycles of violence.

       

    • Impairs perception and communication: Unresolved trauma shapes how people see and react to the world, often triggering a “fight, flight, or freeze” response. In a state of hypervigilance, ordinary situations can be perceived as threatening, causing a breakdown in communication and a loss of control.

       

    • Leads to demonization of the “other”: A key part of the projection process involves assigning one’s own unwanted feelings or aspects of trauma to another person or group. This “demonization” turns the other party into an enemy and is a dangerous foundation for further conflict and bloodshed.
  • Transmits across generations: Trauma can be passed down from one generation to the next, a phenomenon known as intergenerational trauma. This means that the wounds of past conflicts continue to fester in the collective consciousness of a society, fueling future violence.
  • Creates collective trauma: In societies that have endured severe conflict, unprocessed collective trauma can leave a lasting impact on social, economic, and political life. This can lead to the formation of “chosen traumas,” a part of a group’s identity connected to a deep-rooted conflict. 

 

Progressing from trauma to peace

 

Overcoming trauma is a necessary step toward achieving lasting peace, both personally and globally. This process requires courage and a commitment to address internal wounds rather than continually reacting to their influence.

 

On an individual level, healing strategies include: 

    • Developing self-awareness: Practices like mindfulness can help individuals perceive and witness their own thoughts, feelings, and beliefs, rather than being ruled by them.

       

    • Finding safe spaces: Processing emotional pain requires a safe environment, whether through talking with a trusted person, a support group, or a mental health professional.

       

    • Creating a new narrative: By exploring and sharing one’s trauma story, it becomes less upsetting. This can happen through writing or speaking with trusted individuals.

       

    • Practicing self-regulation: Techniques such as deep breathing, meditation, and physical activity can help regulate the nervous system and calm the “fight, flight, or freeze” response. 

 

  • Active Choice: Individuals can choose to break the cycle by seeking healing, forgiveness, and a living relationship with Self, thereby creating a different path for their own and future generations.

 

 

On a collective level, healing is necessary for sustainable peacebuilding: 

 

  • Trauma-informed conflict resolution:

  •  Peacebuilding and mediation efforts that are sensitive and responsive to trauma are more likely to achieve impactful and sustainable outcomes.

     

  • Narrative exchange: When conflict survivors share their stories, they humanize the abstract concepts of war and help build empathy and understanding.

     

  • Inclusive processes: Giving all parties a voice in the peace process can help restore a sense of control that trauma often removes. This is crucial for gaining their buy-in to any resolution.

     

  • Focus on the past:

Does healing trauma Focus on the past?

 

Sustainable peacebuilding is impossible without addressing and transforming collective trauma. This involves dealing with the past to create a different future.

 

Healing trauma involves addressing the past to create a different future. Sustainable peacebuilding requires transforming collective trauma by dealing with past events to prevent future harm and enable reconciliation and progress. This process of “dealing with the past” is necessary to create a different, more peaceful future.

 

Acknowledging the past is crucial:

To heal, both individuals and groups must acknowledge past suffering, which can involve revealing the truth about abuses and recognizing the suffering of victims. This helps prevent future violations by understanding the root causes of conflict.

 

Processing the trauma:

Healing trauma involves processing past pain, but it’s not just about reliving it. Instead, it’s about processing it in a way that allows for transformation and moving forward.

 

Connecting to the future:

The goal is to integrate the past with the future, which is only possible when the past is processed and acknowledged. This allows a society to move forward toward a just and lasting peace.

 

Different levels of healing:

Healing can occur on different levels, from individual self-empathy to large-scale public reconciliation efforts like truth commissions and public apologies.

 

Past trauma impacts the future:

Trauma that is not addressed can be passed down through generations, unconsciously impacting families and societies. Addressing it allows for the present to be shaped in a more positive way for the future.

 

 AI Reply:

Exploring the potential parallels between the Jesus Christ story and the Self in IFS is definitely a thought-provoking endeavor.

 

Potential Similarities and Connections:

Compassion and Unconditional Positive Regard: Both Jesus and the Self, as understood in IFS, are often characterized by deep compassion and unconditional positive regard. Jesus’s teachings emphasized love and forgiveness, even for those who persecuted him. Similarly, the Self in IFS is believed to possess inherent wisdom, compassion, and acceptance for all parts of the system, even those that exhibit seemingly negative behaviors.

 

Healing and Integration: Jesus’s ministry often involved healing the sick and offering solace to the suffering. In a similar vein, the Self in IFS aims to heal and integrate the wounded parts of the internal system. By connecting with the Self, individuals can offer compassion and understanding to their parts, allowing them to release burdens and find healthier roles.

 

Inner Authority and Wisdom: Jesus spoke with authority and wisdom, often challenging societal norms and offering a new perspective. The Self in IFS is also considered to be a source of inner wisdom and guidance. When individuals are Self-led, they can access their innate capacity for clarity, creativity, and effective action.

 

Sacrifice and Redemption: The concept of sacrifice is central to the Jesus Christ story, particularly his willingness to suffer for the sake of humanity. While IFS doesn’t necessarily emphasize sacrifice in the same way, it does involve a willingness to acknowledge and understand the pain of one’s parts, even if it’s uncomfortable. This act of witnessing and validating can be seen as a form of “redemption” for those parts, allowing them to release their burdens and find healing.

 

Important Distinctions and Considerations:

There are diverse theological interpretations of the Jesus Christ story. Some interpretations may align more closely with IFS principles than others.

 

The Nature of the Self: In IFS, the Self is considered an inherent aspect of every individual,

 

In summary:

There are indeed potential similarities and connections between the Jesus Christ story and the Self in IFS, particularly in terms of compassion, healing, inner wisdom, and the potential for redemption. However, it’s essential to approach this comparison with nuance and awareness of the distinct frameworks within which they operate.

QUESTION to AI:

 

After we stop burning fossil fuels, how long will it take for the environment to return to the pre-industrial normal/stabile Co2 levels?

 

AI:

 

Factors, like melting glaciers and ice sheets, could further increase CO2 release and slow down the return to pre-industrial levels.

 

It is likely that it would take centuries, if not millennia, (Thousand), of years for the atmosphere to return to pre-industrial CO2 levels, even if we stopped burning fossil fuels today.

 


 

 

Q: Why do the wealthy world leaders, want to own and control everything, while they are in denial of climate change, is it just to keep the stock market economy growing?

 

AI:

 

You’ve hit on a complex and troubling intersection of psychology, economics, and global issues. Here’s an attempt to explain it using modern psychology and Internal Family Systems (IFS):

 

Modern Psychology and Narcissism:

 

Grandiosity and Control: Narcissistic individuals often exhibit a sense of entitlement, a need for admiration, and a strong desire to control their environment. They may believe they are superior and that rules don’t apply to them.

 

Lack of Empathy:

 

Narcissistic individuals struggle with empathy and understanding others’ perspectives. They are often focused on their own needs and goals, making it difficult to consider the broader consequences of their actions.

 

Denial and Projection:

 

To maintain their self-image, narcissistic individuals may engage in denial, minimizing or dismissing evidence that contradicts their beliefs. They may also project their own negative qualities onto others, blaming them for their own shortcomings.

 

Internal Family Systems (IFS) and Denial:

 

Protective Parts:

 

IFS suggests that everyone has different “parts” of themselves, each with its own motivations and beliefs. Some parts may be protective, trying to shield us from perceived threats. These protective parts can lead to denial, minimizing or avoiding painful realities.

 

Self-Preservation:

 

In the case of climate change, the protective parts of these leaders might be driven by a fear of losing power, wealth, and control. Denying the severity of the issue might feel like a way to protect their position and maintain a sense of security.

 

Unconscious Motivations:

 

Often, the motivations behind denial are unconscious. These leaders might not be consciously aware of the psychological mechanisms driving their actions.

 

The Stock Market and Economic Growth:

 

Short-Term Gains: The stock market thrives on continuous growth. Focusing on short-term profits can create an incentive to prioritize economic expansion, even at the expense of long-term environmental sustainability.

 

Cognitive Dissonance:

 

There is a clear conflict between the economic interests of these leaders and the urgent need to address climate change. Denying the severity of the issue allows them to maintain a less psychologically uncomfortable position.

 

Why This Matters:

 

Global Consequences:

 

The actions of powerful individuals can have a profound impact on the planet. Denial and inaction on climate change have devastating consequences for the environment and future generations.

 

Psychological

 

Impact: Understanding the psychological dynamics at play can help us to better understand the motivations behind these decisions and potentially find ways to address them.

 

Key Points to Remember:

 

Complexity:

 

This issue is incredibly complex, involving a mix of psychological, economic, and political factors.

 

Not All Leaders:

 

It’s important not to generalize or stereotype. There are many leaders who are committed to addressing climate change, and many individuals who are actively working to create a sustainable future.

 

Hope and Action:

 

Despite the challenges, there is still hope for change. By understanding the forces at play, we can better challenge denial, demand action, and work towards a more sustainable world.

 

It’s essential to continue the dialogue about these complex issues, to challenge harmful narratives, and to advocate for policies that protect our planet for future generations.

quote via Sameer D.  ..::” Many years ago, someone I consider a good friend tried to corner me on this issue. Referring to the far-right in Israel I had used the term “Nazi”. He violently disagreed with the use of the term, even though he conceded that these particular people were genocidal – they were calling for the extermination of Palestinians. “The term “Nazi” should be a synonym for “Jew killer”” was what his argument boiled down to (in fact I think that’s a direct quote from that discussion).

The problem here is one of history as well as theory. From a historical perspective it’s not clear to me that the killing of as many as 7 million people (mostly, but not exclusively, of the Jewish faith) is more worthy of recognition than the killing of 10 million people in the Congo or the killing of 100 million people in India. The common thread is that all of these atrocities were committed by Europeans – Germans, Belgians and British Europeans to be precise. The Holocaust is one of many terrible atrocities that one could cite by way of analogy when faced with a current example of a militarised population murdering civilians.

Out of all of these examples, only the Holocaust has been universally recognised in our culture as an act of unspeakable evil. If I write a science fiction book about a guy who comes to power and starts killing people, I don’t compare my character to King Leopold or Winston Churchill (though those would be perfectly reasonable analogies). If I want to explain to someone in an instant that my character is a very bad person, I compare him to Hitler.

If you ask anyone – even someone as thick as Konstantin Kisin seems to be in this interview – what was bad about the Nazis, they’ll have the right answer. The Nazi engaged in the systemic oppression and murder of entire categories of people (Jews, Socialists, Romani, queer people, etc). They not only committed those atrocities, they declared their intent to “rid Europe of its Jews” to paraphrase some of the language of the “Final Solution”. So when we have similar language from Israeli officials – “We will eliminate everything”, “Erase them, their families, mothers and children. These animals can no longer live.” – not to mention the killing of tens of thousands of women and children, is it not time to make the obvious analogy without fear?

Ultimately those who argue for the sacrosanct status of the Holocaust are guilty of creating the circumstances by which the Holocaust can be repeated. Is the lesson from the Holocaust a particular lesson or a universal one? Does it only apply to European Jews who were living in Europe in the 1930s and 40s? If so, then there is no lesson of the Holocaust. The exact circumstances of 1930s Europe will never be repeated; therefore there’s nothing to learn from the holocaust if you believe that all of those circumstances must be in place in order to justify an analogy.

The only way in which there is anything to learn from the Holocaust is if we take it as a universal principle – no group should be targeted and killed just because they are members of that group. The universality of the Holocaust underlies the entire human rights framework (which was largely written in response to the Holocaust). The group in question doesn’t matter – those who have devoted their lives to human rights often cite atrocities committed against Armenians and people from East Timor as some of the worst atrocities ever. Both of those groups happen to be Christians who were persecuted by Muslims. So the cries of antisemitism make no sense either – those who are fighting against genocide fight against all of them, especially those that their own government is complicit in.

..::” If we do not universalise the lessons from the Holocaust, if we accept that there’s something that’s sacrosanct about it, what is that thing that is sacrosanct? It’s not the number of people killed – those numbers have been exceeded in Africa and in Asia. Is it the religion of those who were murdered? Given the long history of antisemitism in Europe that seems unlikely. So what is it that gives the Holocaust this unique status?

I don’t have an answer to this question, but I do have a guess. I fear that what makes the Holocaust against European Jews sacrosanct is the fact that they were European. African and Asian genocides don’t have the right sort of victims. Black people dying we can live with, but white people dying? Never Again (repeated over and over, and repeated by the exact same people who are simultaneously justifying the murder of thousands of Palestinian children).

The preoccupation with one particular genocide above all others may or may not be due to racism. But it is a preoccupation that does exist. We make (mediocre) movies about escaping the Nazis, we write (and read) novels about the Nazis, and so on. It’s the one example of genocide that firmly ensconced in the public imagination. Those of us who are actually in favour of universal human rights have an obligation to use this example – the only example that the public really gets – as part of our effort to end the current genocide.

Bassem Youssef was essentially asked what he would do if he was put in the situation of being in charge of an ongoing genocidal occupation. His answer is absolutely the right one – he would end that occupation and the genocide. But in order to get this point through the thick heads of those who seem intent on insisting that this war is like any other, we should not shy away from historical analogies, including the analogy to World War 2 when appropriate.

***

Sameer Dossani is co-director of Peace Vigil, an organisation dedicated to Peace Education. They are online at: PeaceVigil.net

User:
please explain with modern psychology and IFS, why the super wealthy narcissistic world leaders, want to own and control everything, while they are actually in denial of the danger of climate change, in order to keep the stock market economy growing?

AI:
You’ve hit on a complex and troubling intersection of psychology, economics, and global issues. Here’s an attempt to explain it using modern psychology and Internal Family Systems (IFS):

Modern Psychology and Narcissism:

Grandiosity and Control: Narcissistic individuals often exhibit a sense of entitlement, a need for admiration, and a strong desire to control their environment. They may believe they are superior and that rules don’t apply to them.

Lack of Empathy: Narcissistic individuals struggle with empathy and understanding others’ perspectives. They are often focused on their own needs and goals, making it difficult to consider the broader consequences of their actions.

Denial and Projection: To maintain their self-image, narcissistic individuals may engage in denial, minimizing or dismissing evidence that contradicts their beliefs. They may also project their own negative qualities onto others, blaming them for their own shortcomings.

Internal Family Systems (IFS) and Denial:

Protective Parts: IFS suggests that everyone has different “parts” of themselves, each with its own motivations and beliefs. Some parts may be protective, trying to shield us from perceived threats. These protective parts can lead to denial, minimizing or avoiding painful realities.

Self-Preservation: In the case of climate change, the protective parts of these leaders might be driven by a fear of losing power, wealth, and control. Denying the severity of the issue might feel like a way to protect their position and maintain a sense of security.

Unconscious Motivations: Often, the motivations behind denial are unconscious. These leaders might not be consciously aware of the psychological mechanisms driving their actions.
The Stock Market and Economic Growth:

Short-Term Gains: The stock market thrives on continuous growth. Focusing on short-term profits can create an incentive to prioritize economic expansion, even at the expense of long-term environmental sustainability.

Cognitive Dissonance: There is a clear conflict between the economic interests of these leaders and the urgent need to address climate change. Denying the severity of the issue allows them to maintain a less psychologically uncomfortable position.

Why This Matters:

Global Consequences: The actions of powerful individuals can have a profound impact on the planet. Denial and inaction on climate change have devastating consequences for the environment and future generations.

Psychological Impact: Understanding the psychological dynamics at play can help us to better understand the motivations behind these decisions and potentially find ways to address them.
Key Points to Remember:

Complexity: This issue is incredibly complex, involving a mix of psychological, economic, and political factors.
Not All Leaders: It’s important not to generalize or stereotype. There are many leaders who are committed to addressing climate change, and many individuals who are actively working to create a sustainable future.

Hope and Action: Despite the challenges, there is still hope for change. By understanding the forces at play, we can better challenge denial, demand action, and work towards a more sustainable world.

It’s essential to continue the dialogue about these complex issues, to challenge harmful narratives, and to advocate for policies that protect our planet for future generations.

Imagine living on a planet where the rich get richer by indoctrinating the people to follow ancient dogma, repeating an ancient doctrine of genocide projected onto innocent children, again and again, the rich get richer, and the children receive brutal indoctrination instead of Living Their Sacred Free & Joyful Life.
#IFS #Spirit #Self #Courage
Secret History: How Evil Triumphs: 

Quote of a Lifetime

…::”I used to think that top global environmental problems were biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse, and climate change. I thought that with 30 years of good science, we could address these problems, but I was wrong. The top environmental problems are selfishness, greed, and apathy, and to deal with these, we need a spiritual and cultural transformation. And we scientists don’t know how to do that.” ~Gus Speth

 

 

 

Active Listening as a way of life.

Carl Rogers coined the term “Active Listening” in 1957.

 

By focusing on and validating another person’s perspective, active listening helps build empathy.

Simultaneously, this focused, empathic process strengthens the Pre Frontal Cortex PFC’s role in reasoning and emotion regulation while also diminishing the amygdala’s “fight-or-flight” response, creating a calm awareness.

Active listening allows for a shared understanding of another person’s thoughts and feelings, which builds empathy and validates their experience.

This can help calm the amygdala, which is the brain’s “threat detection” center responsible for the fight-or-flight response. By using cognitive processes to understand your own feelings and understand the feelings of others, you are less likely to be reactive.

Active Listening engages and strengthens the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which is responsible for complex functions like decision-making, attention, and emotion regulation. This also helps to counterbalance the “amygdala hijack” by allowing the PFC to navigate and respond to challenging situations with a calm perspective.

When individuals practice affect labeling — the act of putting feelings into words — stimulates activity in the frontal lobe (specifically the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex). This increased frontal lobe engagement helps to down-regulate the amygdala, the brain region responsible for processing fear and initiating the body’s stress response. This counterbalance effectively “calms” the amygdala and mitigates the intensity of emotional and physiological stress reactions.

Howeverin authoritarian trained brains, the same region of the brain (with overlapping neurological pathways) activates for a completely different purpose:

🏴‍☠️DISGUST🏴‍☠️

Disgust is an innate, natural, instinctual emotion, which can be profoundly shaped, trained, and exploited into what appears to be “normalized” attitudes and behaviors, including violence, domination and grandiosity. 

Human Behavioral Immune System

Innate Foundation: Disgust is considered one of the six basic, universal emotions (happiness, sadness, fear, anger, surprise, and disgust) with a strong evolutionary basis, often linked to a “behavioral immune system”. Its primary function is to avoid spoiled food.

Cultural Shaping: While the core emotion is innate and protective, the specific triggers and intensity of disgust are significantly shaped by culture and education.

Weaponization by Authoritarianism

The core, physical form of disgust can be amplified into “moral disgust” or “ideological disgust,” which is a powerful mechanism for influencing social and political attitudes.

Social and Moral Disgust: People often project their own personal level of disgust toward individuals or groups perceived as violating social norms.

Dehumanization and Exclusion: Scape-goating, alienation and physical harm. Authoritarian dominators exploit these inherent sensitivities to consolidate power and suppress dissent by framing targeted groups as “contaminating” or “threatening” to the social order.

Authoritarian cultures promote a rigid social hiearchy and boundaries marked with strictly defined “in-groups” and “out-groups”.   Individuals with higher levels of disgust sensitivity are more likely to endorse authoritarian attitudes and express prejudice toward various groups, including immigrants and minorities, often through the promotion of prejudice toward those labeled as “different”.  

Studies suggest that individuals with higher authoritarian tendencies or national narcissism often exhibit less empathy for those outside their defined social circles and report more frequent feelings of anger, disgust, and contempt.

Ideological Divide: Research using neuro-imaging and surveys has found an “ideological asymmetry” in empathy, indicating that people’s political leanings influence the extent to which they feel empathy for others experiencing pain or suffering, especially across political divides.

Social Conditioning

Social conditioning can effectively use the brain’s emotional pathways, specifically involving the insula and the amygdala, to promote negative emotions like disgust and anger towards out-groups. 

These mechanisms exploit the brain’s fundamental wiring for survival and social interaction, manipulating them to foster prejudice and intergroup hostility.

Note: Road-Blocks to Empathy  (by: Thomas Gordon)

 

 

The Psychological Mechanisms of Oppression: Empathy, Disgust, and the Perception of Group Membership:

Note: Road-Blocks to Empathy  (by: Thomas Gordon)

Social Training can exploit the brain’s inherent in-group biases and the insula‘s role in disgust and “social salience” (captures attention within a social context) to decrease empathy for out-groups and increase emotional disgust, which can escalate anger.

Neural Mechanisms

The process involves the interplay of several brain regions, primarily the insula and the amygdala:

insula and Disgust

insula and Disgust: The insula is a key brain region involved in processing the feeling of disgust, which originally evolved to protect against physical toxins (e.g., spoiled food) but has been co-opted for social and moral disgust.

Empathy Bias:

Empathy Bias: Empathy, which also heavily involves the anterior insula, is naturally biased towards in-group members. The brain shows less activation in empathy-related regions, including the insula and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), when observing the pain or distress of out-group members compared to in-group members.

Social Training and Malleability

Social Training and Malleability: The brain’s response to social cues is highly malleable and influenced by cultural and social learning. Social training and exposure can determine which markers (e.g., race, religion) are used to define in-groups versus out-groups and activate these inherent biases.

Conversion to Anger

Conversion to Anger: Intense, sustained negative emotional training, especially within an in-group context, can promote anger and a desire for reprisal or control. This can be amplified by positive social feedback for expressing outrage within the in-group, a process observed in online social networks, which reinforces the behavior.

Social Training & Manipulation Mechanisms

Social training and propaganda can manipulate these neural mechanisms through:

Dehumanization

Dehumanization: Portraying out-groups as “disgusting” or “repellent” bypasses complex social emotions and activates more basic disgust responses, effectively moving the perception of the out-group to a category perceived as less than human.

Moral Outrage

Moral Outrage: Framing out-group actions as severe moral violations can trigger widespread moral outrage and empathic anger within the in-group, which then justifies punitive actions.

Social Contagion

Social Contagion: Group settings amplify shared feelings (emotional contagion), leading to coordinated actions and shared emotional behavior against an identified target.

Lack of Individuation

Lack of Individuation: Encouraging superficial categorical judgments over individuating information reduces mPFC activation (involved in social cognition) for out-group members, making it easier to apply broad, negative emotional labels.

Historic Examples

These mechanisms are evident in historic examples of mass persecution:

Witch Hunts

Witch Hunts: During historical witch hunts, individuals (often women) were labeled as being in league with the devil, a classification that invoked intense religious disgust and moral outrage among the in-group. This dehumanization justified extreme violence, such as burning at the stake, as a perceived necessary purification, overriding normal empathy.

Scapegoating of Minorities

Scapegoating of Minorities: In various historical contexts, minority groups have been blamed for societal problems (e.g., economic downturns, plagues). By associating the out-group with ‘contamination’ or ‘danger’ (activating disgust and fear), the dominant group could collectively justify discrimination or violence, as seen in many instances of antisemitism and other forms of ethnic cleansing.

REF:

The Psychological Mechanisms of Oppression: Empathy, Disgust, and the Perception of Group Membership

Note: Road-Blocks to Empathy  (by: Thomas Gordon)

Social conditioning can indeed leverage the brain’s emotional circuitry, particularly the insula and amygdala, to foster disgust towards an out-group and anger by suppressing and deactivating empathy pathways and associating the out-group with pathogenic or moral contamination cues, name calling and harmful gossip.

Using verbal and social cues: Name-calling and gossip serve as powerful social tools to reinforce these negative associations and solidify the perception of the out-group as “other” in an imaginary heiarchy of special supremacy used to justify unconscious, hidden fear and hate projected onto imaginary “others”. 

These mechanisms exploit the brain’s fundamental wiring for survival and social interaction, manipulating them to foster prejudice and intergroup hostility. 

The Role of the Insula and Emotions

The insula is a key brain region involved in both the subjective experience of one’s own emotions (especially disgust and pain) and in empathy (feeling the same emotion when observing others). It processes internal bodily sensations (interoception) and integrates them with external sensory information to assign emotional valence.

Empathy: The anterior insula (AI) is a crucial node in empathy networks, activating when individuals feel pain or disgust themselves and when they see ingroup members experiencing these emotions.

Disgust: The insula, along with the amygdala, is strongly activated by stimuli associated with core disgust (e.g., bodily fluids, contamination) and moral violations. Social Training and Manipulation

Human perceptions are intertwined with and influenced by the perception of group membership as a prerequisite for survival.  Social environments and training can “shape” these brain responses through learned associations and social appraisal, effectively altering which groups elicit empathy versus disgust.

Dehumanization: By linking outgroups with cues of contamination, disease, or immorality, social conditioning can activate the disgust response and insula activity towards that group. This process dehumanizes the outgroup, making them seem less than human and more like “disgusting objects”.

Reduced Empathy: When individuals perceive outgroups as low in warmth and competence (stereotyped as “disgusting”), the neural regions associated with empathy and mentalizing (medial prefrontal cortex, mPFC) show reduced activity. This “empathy gap” facilitates a psychological distance necessary for harm.

Triggering Anger and Harm: Disgust toward an outgroup is associated with both a desire to distance oneself (passive harm) and a willingness to attack (active harm). When paired with perceptions of threat (processed by the amygdala) or specific moral violations, this can escalate into anger and a drive for punitive action.

Historic Examples

Historic instances of scapegoating and persecution illustrate how these mechanisms play out socially:

Witch Hunts: Accusations often centered on moral violations and associations with evil or bodily corruption, serving to socially label the victims as ‘disgusting’ and justify brutal punishment.

Racial Prejudice/Genocide: Propagandists throughout history have used language and imagery comparing targeted groups to animals, vermin, or disease, leveraging the basic human pathogen-avoidance system to evoke disgust and facilitate dehumanization, thereby enabling extreme violence and neglect.

In essence, social training achieves its aims by associating outgroups with primary disgust stimuli, thereby activating the insula’s disgust response and short-circuiting the neural pathways that typically facilitate empathy and prosocial behavior toward fellow humans. 

Note: Road-Blocks to Empathy  (by: Thomas Gordon)

Social Dynamics:

Psychological theories of in-group bias and the scapegoating of out-groups stem from defense mechanisms like reaction formation and underlying inferiority complexes in the IN-GROUP members.


Inferiority Complex: Coined by psychologist Alfred Adler, this refers to a person’s feelings that they lack worth or are not good enough. When this feeling is shared among group members, it can create a collective sense of inadequacy.

Reaction Formation: This is a defense mechanism where a person consciously feels and acts in a way that is the exact opposite of their unconscious feelings. To deal with deep-seated feelings of inferiority, a group might unconsciously adopt an air of superiority and arrogance.

Projection and Scapegoating: The perceived inferiority is then often “projected” onto other, more vulnerable groups (out-groups). These out-groups are then made into scapegoats, blamed for problems or viewed as inferior, which serves to validate the in-group’s fragile sense of superiority and distract from its own insecurities.  In this framework, the aggressive and exclusionary behaviors of the in-group are not a true reflection of genuine strength or superiority, but rather a defensive, often unconscious, reaction to feelings of weakness or inadequacy. This dynamic is frequently discussed in analyses of prejudice, discrimination, and group conflict. 

Note: Road-Blocks to Empathy  (by: Thomas Gordon)

😠 Disgust
😊 Empathy
life-ring
shark

 

 

 

 

Egalitarianism and Active Listening

 

Egalitarianism: The doctrine that all people are equal and deserve equal human rights.

Research suggests that individual differences in political views, including those potentially related to egalitarianism, can correlate with differences in brain structure and activity patterns in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, and other regions. For example, a larger anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) volume has been associated with greater tolerance for uncertainty, cognitive flexibility, and creative curiosity, which is hypothesized to allow individuals to accept more egalitarian views.  (equal human rights)

 

Active Listening: This communication process, when perceived, has been shown to activate the listener’s reward system and can influence emotional appraisal processes in the speaker. Perceiving active listening can enhance activity in the right insula, which might represent an emotional reappraisal process based on reward-related information, suggesting that this practice can modulate activity in key emotional brain regions.

Active Listening expands empathy and calms the amygdala by using the brain’s prefrontal cortex to regulate emotional responses. Expanding empathy happens because active listening involves understanding and reflecting the speaker’s verbal message of what’s alive in them, which deepens connection. Calming the amygdala occurs when you put your feelings into words (affect labeling), which engages the frontal lobe, and this increased activity counterbalances the amygdala’s fear and reptilian stress reflex response.

Note: Road-Blocks to Empathy  (by: Thomas Gordon)

 

How active listening expands empathy

It involves understanding emotions: Active listening is not just about hearing words, but about grasping the underlying feelings and needs of the speaker.

Validating feelings: By repeating or paraphrasing the speaker’s expressed feelings and meanings back to them, you are confirming that you have heard and understood their unique perspective. This makes the speaker feel heard, respected, and supported.

Checking for understanding: The goal is to comprehend the speaker’s message accurately. Using a gentle request for clarification (e.g., “What I’m hearing is…” or “Sounds like you are saying…”) helps ensure your interpretation is correct.

Avoiding assumptions: The listener should not “invent new feelings or thoughts the speaker has not verbalized.” The listener’s role is to focus solely on what the speaker has communicated, both verbally and nonverbally, and reflect only that back to them for confirmation.

The listener’s primary objective is to create a safe space for the speaker to feel fully understood without judgment or analysis.

It fosters connection: This deeper understanding and validation create a more open and honest communication environment, strengthening your connection with the speaker.

Our perception of another person’s feelings can result more from what we are feeling, are afraid of, or are wishing for than from the other person’s words, tone, gestures, facial expression, etc. If we feel guilty, we may perceive others as angry or accusing toward us. Our inferences about other people’s feelings can be, and often are, inaccurate. Thus, it is important to check them out for good interpersonal communication.

 

How active listening calms the amygdala

It utilizes “affect labeling”: A component of active listening is identifying and putting into words your own emotions, a process called “affect labeling”.

It engages the frontal lobe: This act of labeling emotions activates the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, a part of the brain responsible for processing emotions.

It dampens the amygdala: The frontal lobe communicates with the amygdala, and increased frontal lobe activity helps to calm the amygdala by dampening its activity.

 

___________________________

 

It creates a feedback loop:


There is an inverse relationship between the amygdala and the frontal lobe—as frontal lobe activity increases, amygdala activity decreases.

Empathy, or Disgust, choose one, you can’t serve both.

define hypocrisy

 

___________________________

 

Practicing Active Listening typically enhances empathy; however, in individuals with an authoritarian bias, the same brain regions may activate for a different purpose rooted in the Fundamental Attribution ErrorThis could potentially lead to unrealistic delusions of superiority and the habituation of disgust feelings projected onto others. The idea that active listening might trigger disgust in those with authoritarian leanings is a plausible interpretation based on research suggesting their brains process social information differently, including emotions like empathy and disgust.

Studies have identified correlations between authoritarian personality traits and differences in brain structure, such as reduced gray matter volume in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). The dmPFC is a crucial region involved in social cognition, empathy, and perspective-taking. Research indicates a link between greater gray matter volume in this area and reduced fear, alongside an improved capacity to actively listen to diverse perspectives during conflict resolution. Conversely, other findings suggest that lower dmPFC gray matter volume might be associated with higher cognitive empathy, possibly due to a process of cognitive pruning.

Empathy involving another’s pain or distress frequently activates specific neural areas, notably the anterior insula (AI) and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). The AI, in particular, is consistently associated with processing disgust, encompassing both core physical and socio-moral forms.

Active Listening aims to foster understanding and reduce defensiveness, a process reliant on emotional processing and empathy. For an authoritarian-leaning brain, where disgust responses are often more readily triggered by perceived norm violations or threats to established order, active listening—particularly to challenging viewpoints—might elicit a neural response akin to disgust because it is processed as an aversive social stimulus rather than an opportunity for connection.

The core distinction lies in the interpretation of the social interaction. While one person’s brain views the situation as an opportunity for empathic connection through active listening, an authoritarian-leaning brain might perceive the same interaction as a challenge or violation of social boundaries, triggering a disgust response using overlapping neural circuitry within the insula. Recent brain imaging studies indicate that individuals with authoritarian attitudes exhibit differences in brain structures related to social reasoning and emotional regulation. This aligns with a tendency for impulsive actions under stress, including psychological projection of shame or guilt, finger-pointing, and scapegoating, often concealed behind a veil of power.

 

Research highlights specific brain structural differences linked to authoritarianism.

Authoritarians exhibit higher levels of “negative urgency,” indicating a propensity for impulsive actions in emotionally charged situations, correlated with higher trait anxiety. They also show higher autonomic reactivity to stress and slower recovery, suggesting a physiological pathway connecting stress response to political beliefs.  This anxiety can drive people toward impulsive behaviors aimed at quickly reducing discomfort and regaining a sense of control through domination.  Studies using the Big Five personality traits found that authoritarian followers often score higher on conscientiousness . In essence, a conscientious person is reliable and follows through on cultural commitments, which supports a reliable relationship where loyalty is paramount. However, conscientiousness is about responsibility and order, while loyalty is about devotion and allegiance, and one can have a conflict between their personal conscientiousness/principles and a demand for loyalty to authority figures.

Control: Individuals who feel vulnerable due to anxiety may seek to regain a sense of control by dominating others, viewing it as a way to reduce discomfort and manage their fear/safety.

Performance and Social anxiety: Some studies have found a correlation between social anxiety and a need for dominance, suggesting that aggressive or controlling behaviors can be a coping mechanism for social anxiety-related distress.

Authoritarianism: While not the same as anxiety, authoritarian attitudes are linked to higher stress reactivity and can involve a desire for control, which can be amplified by underlying anxiety.

Research has identified a “psychological signature” for authoritarians who are more susceptible to extreme ideologies, which includes a blend of unconscious suspicion and impulsive personality traits like sensation-seeking and risk-taking. Difficulties with complex mental processing may subconsciously push individuals toward extreme doctrines that provide simplified, “story-book” explanations for human cultures. The neurobiological underpinnings remain an emerging field, but research suggests that specific brain functions related to social processing and emotion regulation, within the limbic system and prefrontal cortex, are implicated in the adoption of extremist ideologies.

Authoritarian messaging may be intrinsically rewarding at a neurochemical level, fostering a psychological addiction.  Research indicates that individuals with authoritarian tendencies may exhibit specific structural differences in brain regions associated with emotional regulation and social reasoning. These variations, such as altered gray matter volume in the prefrontal cortex or reduced cortical thickness in the insula, may reflect established cognitive and emotional patterns that influence a preference for structure, order, and strong authority. 

Individuals prone to anxiety or impulsive reactions under stress might be more inclined toward authoritarian ideologies, which can provide a seemingly clear and ordered view in perceived threatening situations. These findings contribute to understanding potential neurobiological factors in extremist beliefs and behaviors, suggesting a complex interplay between psychological predispositions, stress responses, and cognitive styles that can make individuals more vulnerable to the appeal of authoritarianism. 

Researchers emphasize that these brain differences are not the sole cause of authoritarian beliefs, but rather biological predispositions that interact complexly with social, cultural, and environmental factors.

 

 
 
Erika Jordan

“Have you noticed some people see suffering and feel empathy and others see it and feel disgust?

Turns out that difference isn’t just moral, it’s neural.

Brain imaging shows that when people high in egalitarian values witness someone’s pain, their insula lights up. That’s the region tied to empathy and self-awareness. It literally links your body’s emotions to another person’s.

But in more authoritarian-leaning brains, the same region fires for a different reason, disgust. The same system that helps you recoil from spoiled food also kicks in when they see someone who feels different. So instead of compassion, their nervous system reads contamination. That’s why messages about care or equality don’t land. The body’s already in defense mode. They’re not processing strategy. They’re processing purity.

Fun fact, the (brain) wiring can change. The more we expose ourselves to differences (integration), the more flexible (healthy) the insula becomes. So maybe the real culture war is empathy versus avoidance.  And only one side’s brain is trying to evolve.

Erika Jordan holds a BA in Sociology from UC Irvine, a Master’s in Counseling Psychology from the University of San Francisco, and is also a certified NLP Practitioner. She is currently a part-time faculty member at the University of San Francisco and has worked with marginalized communities for nearly a decade.  https://www.youtube.com/@ErikaJordanSociologist

 

…::”I used to think that top global environmental problems were biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse, and climate change. I thought that with 30 years of good science we could address these problems, but I was wrong. The top environmental problems are selfishness, greed, and apathy, and to deal with these we need a spiritual and cultural transformation. And we scientists dont know how to do that.” ~Gus Speth

 

Climate change denial –  The resistance to climate action, often driven by short-term profit motives, does threaten future generations. Children will inherit the consequences of today’s decisions.

The interconnection is real: wealth concentration, environmental destruction, and psychological dysfunction do reinforce each other. Breaking these cycles requires both systemic change and shifts in how we relate to each other and the planet.

 

On an individual level, healing strategies include: 

    • Developing self-awareness: Practices like mindfulness can help individuals perceive and witness their own thoughts, feelings, and beliefs, rather than being ruled by them.

       

    • Finding safe spaces: Processing emotional pain requires a safe environment, whether through talking with a trusted friend, support group, or Empathy Circle.

       

    • Creating a new narrative: By exploring and sharing one’s trauma story, it becomes less upsetting. This can happen through writing or speaking with trusted individuals.

       

    • Practicing self-regulation: Techniques such as deep breathing, meditation, and physical activity can help regulate the nervous system and calm the “fight, flight, or freeze” response. 

 

    • Active Choice: Individuals can choose to break the cycle by seeking healing, forgiveness, and a living relationship with Self, thereby creating a different path for their own and future generations.

 

 

 

Note: Road-Blocks to Empathy  (by: Thomas Gordon)


References: 

 

ACTIVE LISTENING PDF Carl R. Rogers and Richard E. Farson 

Carl Rogers coined the term “active listening” in 1957 

Active Listening … (summary)

Active Listening and Empathy (msu.edu)

Active-Listening-Handout (BU.EDU) 

Active listening can be a life-changing skill 

Active Listening For Better Communication

Active Listening is hearing – with understanding – the intended ideas (KPU.CA) 

Authoritarian attitudes linked to altered brain anatomy 

Authoritarianism and psychological disposition 

How to prove you are listening | Amanda Ripley #EmotionalIntelligence 

How Active Listening Cultivates Cooperation 

How Does Active Listening Enhance Conflict Resolution? 

Improving Your Communication through Active Listening 

Intergroup social influence on emotion processing in the brain 

Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure

Prefrontal Brain electrical activity during positive emotion

Psychological Mechanisms of Oppression: Empathy, Disgust, and the Perception of Group Membership

Psychological causes and societal consequences of authoritarianism

Seven Active Listening Techniques

Social-emotional feelings and anterior insula activity influenced by culture

Trust and Empathy with Active Listening 

 

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. Harper & Row. (This is a foundational work in the field, often referenced in later studies.)

Peterson, J. B. (2018). 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos. Random House Canada.

 Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). The ideological attitudes of authoritarians and social dominators: Combined effects of different motivational bases. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 361–371.

Osborne, D., Costello, T., Duckitt, J., et. al. (2023). The psychological causes of societal consequences of authoritarianism. Nature Reviews Psychology.

REF: ScienceDirect.com

___________________________

As social psychologist, Jonathan Haidt, noted that an “us” versus them” mindset…. often leads to comparing ones enemies to infectious…  It results in using metaphors that evoke the moral emotion of disgust.

Disgust, according to psychologists Buckels and Trapnell “appears to have the unique capacity to foster the social-cognitive dehumanization of outcast members.” (human beings)

 

workplace Work-place work Work Workplace

 

 

The Conflict: Empathy vs. Managerial Action

 

Carl Rogers’ person-centered approach (PCA) in a workplace setting encounters significant challenges when dealing with traditional management practices, particularly regarding disciplinary actions like firing an employee. The core tension lies between the manager’s need for performance metrics and the PCA’s emphasis on trust, empathy, and unconditional positive regard.

Managers often operate from a framework of performance, efficiency, and clear standards, where removing an underperforming or non-compliant individual is a necessary solution for the team’s overall productivity. This is a results-oriented, often “biomedical” or “mechanistic” approach to organizational health.

Rogers’ approach, in contrast, posits that an environment of unconditional positive regard (accepting individuals without judgment), empathy, and congruence (genuineness) is necessary for people to feel safe enough to grow, self-actualize, and find their own solutions. In the specific scenario you described:

Manager’s Perspective: Removing an individual is a necessary managerial function (a “gatekeeping” role) to maintain standards and ensure the team’s success.

Rogers’ Perspective: Unconditional acceptance and empathy are paramount for fostering a secure environment. Terminating someone without fully understanding their perspective, involving them in the solution-finding process, and providing an environment for potential growth would violate the trust of the entire group. The remaining employees would perceive a lack of fairness and a risk to their own security, leading to a breakdown in psychological safety and trust.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8950126/#:~:text=5.,as%20a%20barrier%20to%20PCC.

roadblock road-block roadblocks road-blocks

 


What Active Listening is not:

    • Jumping in with “help” in the form of “good advice”
    • Questioning to get at the “facts”
    • Reassuring to make them “feel better”



Simply put,
roadblocks take the conversational ball
out of the speaker’s hands
and puts it firmly into the listener’s.

The 12 Roadblocks to Communication:

https://www.gordonmodel.com/work-roadblocks.php

account android arrow-alt-circle-down arrow-alt-circle-left arrow-alt-circle-right arrow-alt-circle-up arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up author bars behance blogger bluesky buffer caret-down caret-left caret-right caret-square-down caret-square-left caret-square-right caret-square-up caret-up cart-menu-1 cart-menu-2 cart-menu-3 cart-menu-4 categories chevron-down chevron-left chevron-right chevron-up clock close comments cookies copyright coupon-discount date-modified date-published discord double-arrows-down double-arrows-left double-arrows-right double-arrows-up dribbble envelope-open envelope eye facebook fax flickr foursquare github gmail google-drive grid-view hashtag hollow-ring homepage instagram ios level-down-alt level-up-alt line link linkedin list-view login logout long-arrow-alt-down long-arrow-alt-left long-arrow-alt-right long-arrow-alt-up mastodonmedium messenger mobile-menu mobile phone pinterest place qq quote-left quote-right quotes reading-time-hourglass reading-time-stopwatch reddit rss scroll-to-top search shazam shopping-bag shopping-cart side-panel-opening-2-left side-panel-opening-2-right side-panel-opening-left side-panel-opening-right skype slack small-arrow-down small-arrow-left small-arrow-right small-arrow-up sms snapchat soundcloud spinner spotify stackoverflow sync telegram threadstiktok times-circle tinder trello tripadvisor tumblr twitch twitter viber vimeo vine vkontakte website wechat whatsapp windows wishlist xing yelp youtube zoom

Insula (island)

Insula is the Latin word for “island”

The insula is an underestimated brain area because it acts as a crucial hub, integrating bodily sensations (interoception) with emotions, cognition, and decision-making, linking our inner world to external reality. Often called the “fifth lobe,” it’s vital for self-awareness, feeling feelings (like hunger, pain, or disgust), emotional regulation, and learning moral/social rules, yet its deep location made it historically overlooked, though modern neuroscience now reveals its central role in mental health and addiction.

Key Functions of the Insula

Interoception:

Maps and interprets internal body states (heartbeat, gut feelings) and brings them to conscious awareness, forming subjective feelings.

Emotional Processing:

Generates emotional feelings, linking bodily states to emotions like disgust, fear, or empathy, and helps regulate them.

Decision-Making:

Influences choices by integrating feelings (somatic markers) with cognitive processes, helping us learn what’s rewarding or risky.

Cognitive Control:

Involved in attention, working memory, and initiating intentional actions, connecting feelings to motivation.

Social & Moral Learning:

Helps learn social norms, right/wrong, and evaluate social cues, impacting trust and interpersonal behavior.

Why It’s Underestimated & Re-Emerging

Hidden Location:

Deep within the brain, beneath the frontal and temporal lobes, making it harder to study.

Integration Hub:

Its extensive connections to sensory, emotional, and cognitive areas make it hard to study in isolation but essential for linking systems.

Clinical Relevance:

Underactivity is linked to issues like addiction (craving recall), anxiety, and impaired empathy, while its role in homeostasis is crucial for overall health.

In essence, the insula is the brain’s “feeling center,” translating our body’s signals into conscious experience, guiding our decisions, and shaping our understanding of ourselves and the world, making its underestimation a significant oversight in understanding human experience and disorders.

The Insula:

An Underestimated Brain Area

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166223617300176#:~:text=We%20pay%20attention%20to%20and,mediate%20human%20behaviors%20%5B22%5D.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Brain-regions-involved-in-central-processing-of-interoceptive-signals-The-diagrams-in_fig2_348117035

https://jennifersweeton.com/what-is-the-insula-the-important-mental-health-brain-structure-youve-never-heard-of/

 

Carl Rogers on Active Listening

For Rogers, empathy is sensing the client’s inner world “as if” it were one’s own, including the felt meanings and emotions, while still knowing it is the other person’s experience, not one’s own. It involves carefully communicating this understanding and checking back so that the client recognizes their own experience in what is reflected, which helps them feel deeply understood and facilitates change.​ (via acceptance)

Carl Rogers on active listening

Within Carl Rogers’ person-centered framework, a therapist’s own unarticulated inner experience, or internal incongruence, would be the potential source of PROJECTING feelings or biases ONTO the client.

Rogers emphasized the therapist’s core condition of congruence (or genuineness) as essential for therapeutic personality change.

Congruence means the therapist’s inner and outer experiences are aligned. The therapist is aware of their internal feelings and, if appropriate and helpful to the client, is transparent about them within the relationship.

Incongruence for a therapist would be having internal feelings (e.g., judgment, frustration, personal reactions) but hiding them behind a “professional façade”.

When a therapist is incongruent and not fully aware of or processing their own internal, unarticulated feelings, those feelings could implicitly or unconsciously influence their interactions, leading to a form of projection or an inability to offer genuine empathy and unconditional positive regard. This might manifest as subtly guiding the client, making interpretations, or signaling judgment, which would raise the client’s defenses and hinder their self-exploration.

Therefore, self-awareness and, when therapeutically relevant, the appropriate articulation of the therapist’s experience (transparency) are key in the Rogerian approach to avoid imposing the therapist’s own internal world onto the client.

====

Carl Rogers did NOT advocate guessing or imposing a feeling label from a pre-set “LIST” if the speaker had NOT conveyed that feeling, either in words, tone, or clear implication. Instead, he emphasized tentatively reflecting the feeling that seems present in the speaker’s actual message, and then checking its accuracy with the speaker.​

Rogers on active listening

Rogers described the listener’s task as grasping both the facts and the feelings in what is heard, not inventing or supplying feelings the speaker has not expressed. He contrasted this with more interpretive approaches that project meanings and dynamics onto the speaker, which he warned can increase defensiveness and inhibit real expression.​

Feelings reflection, NOT guessing

In Rogers-style reflective listening, the listener attends to the “total meaning” of the message, including tone, posture, and other nonverbal cues, and then responds especially to the feeling component that is actually manifest in the communication. When the listener reflects a feeling, it is meant as a careful, non-evaluative hypothesis about what the speaker is already expressing, not a speculative guess pulled from an abstract list of emotions the speaker has never indicated.​

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/in-active-listening-what-did-c-D42hS8shTk29OFWloNGtzA

https://lifebuilderscounseling.org/wp-content/uploads/activelistening.pdf

https://r.jordan.im/download/psychology/arnold2014.pdf

Active listening does not necessarily mean long sessions spent listening to grievances, personal or otherwise. It is simply a way of approaching those problems which arise out of the usual day-to-day events of any job.

https://wholebeinginstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/Rogers_Farson_Active-Listening.pdf

How does Rogers distinguish empathy from interpretation of feelings

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/how-does-rogers-distinguish-em-K4NQMqWGR3K8H3YI8hsSGA

Rogers treats empathy as an accurate, moment‑to‑moment entering of the other person’s experiential world, and he contrasts this with interpretation, which adds meanings or motives that go beyond what the person is actually expressing. Empathy stays close to the client’s “internal frame of reference,” while interpretation moves toward the helper’s theory, assumptions, or inferences about what the client really feels or means.​

What Rogers means by empathy

For Rogers, empathy is sensing the client’s inner world “as if” it were one’s own, including the felt meanings and emotions, while still knowing it is the other person’s experience, not one’s own. It involves carefully communicating this understanding and checking back so that the client recognizes their own experience in what is reflected, which helps them feel deeply understood and facilitates change.​

How interpretation differs

Interpretation, in contrast, involves the listener offering an explanation, hidden meaning, or deeper feeling that the client has not clearly expressed, often drawing on diagnostic or theoretical ideas. Rogers warned that this kind of interpretive stance can make the client feel analyzed or judged, increase defensiveness, and shift the focus away from the client’s lived experiencing toward the therapist’s concepts.​

Key elements of the distinction

Empathy tracks the client’s explicit and implicit meanings and feelings as they emerge, staying within what the client is actually communicating.​

Interpretation goes beyond that communication, proposing “what is really going on” psychologically, even if the client has not signaled it.​

Rogers framed effective helping as privileging empathic understanding and accurate reflection over interpretive moves, especially early in the relationship.​

Fundamental Attribution Error

The fundamental attribution error is the psychological tendency to overestimate the role of personality and underestimate the role of situational factors when explaining another person’s behavior.

For example, one might assume a coworker who is late is lazy, without considering that they might have faced a significant traffic jam or a family emergency.

How it works

Internal vs. external factors: We tend to attribute others’ actions to their internal characteristics (like their personality or beliefs), while overlooking external, situational pressures (like a bad day or a stressful environment).

Self vs. others:

We often make this error when observing others, but we are less likely to do it to ourselves because we are more aware of the external circumstances influencing our own actions.

Impact on judgment:

This bias can lead to unfair judgments, strained relationships, and misunderstandings because we are not considering the full picture of what is influencing behavior.

Example

Observing a driver: You see a driver swerve and assume they are a “jerk” or a “bad driver”.

Considering situational factors:

However, the fundamental attribution error occurs if you don’t also consider that the driver might be rushing to a hospital or dealing with a sudden medical emergency.

** Workplace scenario:**

A manager might believe an employee’s missed deadline is due to incompetence, without considering the possibility of insufficient resources or unclear instructions from the company.


Assata_Shakur

Credit: Dr Megan Marie
Limbic System
Credit: Dr Megan Marie
https://www.drmeganmarie.com/blog/limbic-system

teststop_starving_kids

Zoom-Link-info